2011年8月30日 星期二

clean energy and jobs

NYT, Does America Need Manufacturing?
If the battery stimulus ultimately succeeds, does it demonstrate that expanding the United States' economy only through knowledge and services is no longer a viable strategy? 「All of the great new American companies of the past few decades,」 says Suzanne Berger, a chairwoman of M.I.T.'s panel on the future of American manufacturing, 「have focused on research and development and product definition — Apple, Qualcomm, Cisco.」 These were technology companies that could take full advantage of what she calls the 「modularity」 of the global economy. Their genius resided in the design of their gadgets and information systems; offshoring the industrial work did not leave them at a disadvantage. It did the opposite, greatly reducing costs and raising profits. 「Now I think we're at a really different moment,」 Berger says. 「We're seeing a wave of new technologies, in energy, biotechnology, batteries, where there has to be a closer integration between research, development, design, product definition and production.」

沒有留言:

張貼留言

20200703 中國情勢暨兩岸雙週報:進化中的中國資訊戰與中共統戰制度剖析

中國暨兩岸情勢雙週報 http://x-strait.blogspot.tw 民進黨中國事務部 2020.07.03 編注:本期雙週報是根據上期「進化中的中國資訊戰」 進行剖析並附上參考圖。 進化中的中國資訊戰 林雨蒼、沈伯洋 ...